Thursday, January 19, 2006

Monte Cristo, and the Pomposity of Food

In a post on another site, someone remarked that a 'foodie' would never be caught dead in a chain restaurant, or at least, admit to it. Of course I emphatically disagree with two points of that statement.

First, the term 'foodie.' To me, foodie translates to culinary dilettante. Someone who loves eating food but has no idea how to prepare it. As it says under my bio, I am not a foodie. I am a glutton. I eat at chain restaurants.

The second point is that I don't think a foodie would be pompous enough to rule out an entire food source because they deign it beneath them. To be a gourmand, or even a foodie, you would embrace all food, and revel in taste, presentation and fellowship, regardless of the venue.

Why do I defend eating at chain restaurants? Because chain restaurants are where the gross excesses of American culinary imagination reside. There is a time and a place to merit excess, and chains like Claim Jumper have built an empire serving enormous plates of food that could feed an entire Pacific Island, let alone your teenage son.

Whoever thinks that a lover of food would never eat at a chain restaurant has never been in charge of entertaining a horde of kids. Any parent issued the unfortunate mission of having to feed a screaming battalion of children knows what I am talking about. You need lots of food to feed a swarm of unsophisticated palettes, cheap.

The fact is, chain food isn't all that bad. These restaurant groups spend millions developing recipes that mass audiences will devour like hyenas. That's how they make all their money. The Cheesecake Factory wouldn't have two hour waits if the food sucked.

So, let's quash this arrogant notion that 'real foodies' don't eat at chain restaurants. I eat at chains, delis, cafes, vending machines, fast food, dives, and stands, and I consider myself a competant and informed food critic.

So, what does this have to do with the Monte Cristo? Well, it is easily my favorite sandwich that happens to come from a chain restaurant, Bennigans. Yeah, Bennigans.

If you want to shuttle yourself to an early grave from either gross obesity or cardiac failure, the quicket way to establish your mortality would be to eat a Monte Cristo every day. This is the purest example of gross excess.



From their website:
A delicious combination of ham and turkey, plus Swiss and American cheeses on wheat bread. Lightly battered and fried until golden. Dusted with powdered sugar and served with red raspberry preserves for dipping.

No matter the description, it still reeks of stroke dipped in heart attack. Monte Cristo is to the club sandwich as deep fried Twinkie is to shortcake. They took something unhealthy and made it poisonous.

Don't get me wrong, this is one of the greatest sandwiches in the world, it's just inappropriate on every level. It gives an unapologetic finger to every credible medical journal, yoga class or hysterical diet in existence.

I love digging my way though the greasy, one-pound sandwich that comes quartered on a bed of french fries. Honestly, I've never finished one in a single sitting, I usually take home half or split it with someone.

So, if you want to elevate your spirit and cholesterol, if you can even find a Bennigan's, I dare you to eat a Monte Cristo. You might find you can't live without it.

6 Comments:

  • I bumped up against that "real foodies don't" comment too. Personally, I don't consider myself a foodie or not a foodie--I just can't STAND that term. It's like calling yourself a Yuppie or a Gen X-er, or something else unquantifiable.

    My wife and I were recalling an old friend who used to hold big dinner parties. We were "occasional guests" who would join dinner with his "regulars", who included a self-described "wine connoiseur" a "food connoiseur" and a "cigar connosieur." It used to drive us crazy that anyone would ever call themselves a connoiseur--without a lot of proof to back it up.

    Similarly, I feel when people call themselves "foodies," they're using it in a self-congratulatory way, like their separate. The "real foodies would never" bit fed my stereotype of self-described "foodies."

    By Anonymous Why We Type, at 5:37 PM  

  • I had a $3.99 coupon for a Bennigan's Monte Cristo and decided to get "one to go". Oh my Gosh! I have to learn to make one of those! It was a very unhealthy, but wonderful experience! I could only eat part of it. I fed the fries to my 3 puppies when I got home and shared the balance of the sandwich with my hubby who also said he "could get into those"! I found a recipe for a clone, but can't tell if they get deep fried before or after they get sliced into sections.

    I'm sure we'll go back for another. We don't eat out often, but that is a great treat! I rarely eat greasy or sweet food. This was kinda both. But Good!

    By Anonymous Susie, at 5:09 PM  

  • Forget war. If we just fed these to enemy combatants, they would die of obesity and heart failure before you could say "insurgency"

    They are too addictive.

    By Blogger Steve Wasser, at 11:45 AM  

  • Deadly, yes, but ohmygod sooo good!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:12 PM  

  • The Monte Cristo is truly an awesome sandwich, but you make it sound as if Bennigan's is the only place you can get one. The wonders of the Monte Cristo know no borders or allegiance to any one restaurant.

    By Blogger Mark, at 3:23 AM  

  • I stumbled across your blog while searching for images of the Bennigan's Monte Cristo...

    I actually had never heard of this sandwich before I ordered it at Bennigan's, but man I wish I had.

    This was the most appalling food item I've ever ordered. A sure fire way to send yourself to an early grave, indeed.

    Good post!

    By Blogger The Jerc, at 7:48 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home